There are exactly four AI image detector Chrome extensions worth installing. Here is an honest comparison — what each one does well, who it is actually built for, and which one you should install first.
Published July 2026 · By Duron Epps Jr., founder of Faux Spy
If you just need the answer: install Faux Spy if you're checking photos on dating apps, social media, or any website as an individual. Use Hive if you're a content moderation team. The other two are worth knowing but have real limitations for everyday use.
| Extension | Free tier | Right-click | Account required | Dating apps | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faux Spy | 10 scans/day | Yes | No | Yes — built for it | Individuals, dating, social media |
| Hive AI Detector | Limited | No | Yes | Partial | Enterprise content moderation |
| BitMind | Yes | Partial | No | Limited | General image detection |
| Is It AI? | Web only | No | No | No | Web-based uploads |
What it does: Right-click any image on any website in Chrome (or Firefox) and get a verdict in about 2 seconds — Real, Likely AI, AI Photo, AI Art, or Inconclusive. A confidence score comes with every result. It works on dating apps (Tinder, Bumble, Hinge in browser), social media (Instagram, LinkedIn, Facebook, X, TikTok), news sites, marketplaces, and anywhere else you browse.
Why it stands out:
Limitations: The free tier is 10 scans/day. Pro ($9.99/month) unlocks unlimited scans, deepfake detection, and case file history. No offline mode.
Install: Faux Spy on Chrome Web Store — free. Also available as a Firefox add-on.
Try Faux Spy right now
🕵️ Add to Chrome — Free10 checks/day free · No account required · Right-click any image
No extension? Check any photo online at fauxspy.com/check →
What it does: Hive Moderation is a content moderation platform that includes an AI image detection component. Their Chrome extension overlays detection results on images as you browse. Hive goes beyond still images — they detect NSFW content, hate symbols, AI-generated video, and text.
Why it stands out:
Limitations: Not built for the individual user. Requires account setup. The free tier is limited and gated. The UX is optimized for moderation workflows, not "I need to check this Tinder profile right now." Pricing for Pro tiers is enterprise-level.
Who should use it: Platform teams, marketplaces, and content moderation operations at scale. Not a fit for personal use.
What it does: BitMind is a free AI image detector that works as a browser extension and a web tool. It analyzes images and returns a probability score for AI generation. Built on open-source models.
Why it stands out:
Limitations: The right-click detection is partial — it doesn't work on all image types and fails on some social media implementations where images are rendered via canvas or protected URLs. Detection accuracy on newer generators (Flux, DALL-E 3) lags behind tools using API-based detection pipelines. The UI is minimal to the point of being sparse.
Who should use it: Researchers and technically curious users who want a free, no-account baseline. For daily use on dating apps, the coverage gaps are a real limitation.
What it does: Is It AI? (isitai.com) is primarily a web-based AI image detector, not a Chrome extension. You upload an image or paste a URL and get a detection result. They have some browser integration but it's not a full right-click extension.
Why it stands out:
Limitations: Not actually a Chrome extension in the traditional sense. You have to save the image, go to the website, and upload — a workflow that breaks down when you're actively browsing dating apps or social media. No right-click detection. Not practical for on-the-fly verification.
Who should use it: Someone who already has an image file and wants a quick free check. Not for browsing-integrated detection.
All four tools can detect AI-generated images. The real difference is workflow — how much friction stands between you and a verdict.
Right-click vs. upload: Right-click detection (Faux Spy) means you never leave the page. Upload detection (most tools) means you need to: find the image URL or save the file, open a new tab, paste or upload, wait for results. On a dating app where you're browsing profiles in real time, upload-based tools add 60–90 seconds of friction per image. That's the difference between checking one photo and actually building the habit of checking photos.
Account vs. no account: Account-gated tools create a barrier that most people don't clear. The best detector is the one you actually use. Faux Spy and BitMind require no account — you install and go.
Individual vs. enterprise: Hive is genuinely better for enterprise use cases — broader detection scope, API access, moderation integrations. It's not the right choice for the person checking whether their match on Bumble is real. Faux Spy is purpose-built for that use case.
If you want to check a specific image without installing anything, fauxspy.com/check lets you paste any image URL or upload a file and get a result instantly. Free, no account. The browser extension is better for ongoing use — but the web tool is the fastest way to check a single photo right now.
Faux Spy: 10 scans/day, no account. BitMind: free with some limitations. Hive: limited free tier, account required. Is It AI?: web-based only, no extension. For daily use with no friction, Faux Spy's free tier is the most usable.
Faux Spy works on Tinder and Bumble (browser versions). Open the app in Chrome, right-click any profile photo, select "Investigate." You get a verdict in about 2 seconds. The other extensions have varying support for dating app images depending on how the platform serves images.
Faux Spy achieves ~94% accuracy on images from Midjourney, DALL-E 3, Stable Diffusion, and Flux. No tool is 100% accurate — AI generators improve faster than detectors, and heavily post-processed images are harder to classify. A confidence score (which Faux Spy provides) is more useful than a binary yes/no, because it tells you when to be skeptical even on uncertain results.
Good question — most roundup articles about "AI detector Chrome extensions" are about detecting AI-generated TEXT (for plagiarism checking, academic integrity). The market for image detection is separate and has fewer tools. For image detection specifically, the extensions listed here are the relevant ones.
If you're an individual who wants to verify photos on dating apps, social media, or any website — install Faux Spy. Right-click detection, no account, 10 free checks/day. It's the only extension in this list built for that specific use case.
If you're a platform or content moderation team processing user-generated content at scale — look at Hive AI Detector. Enterprise scope, API access, broader modality coverage.
For a quick one-time check without installing anything: fauxspy.com/check. Paste a URL or upload a file. Free, no account.
🕵️ Add to Chrome — Free 🦊 Add to Firefox — Free10 checks/day free. No account required.